When is it better to own or access workspace services

[Suzy]

Interested to start a peer-to-peer conversation amongst the occupiers on different space-as-a-service models and ways to balance out risk / reward of a scalable, on-demand workspace service with traditional leasehold procurement. 

When is it better for organisations to own or access future workspace services ?   

Are efficiency benefits offered by cooperativism in the sharing economy model better aligned to start-ups and flex workspaces where exclusive possession offer little value add ?

Are bespoke managed office solutions crafted with building owner a lower risk solution to traditional serviced office / co-working operators ?

What are the most important factors tilting the argument for you ? .. fluctuations in space usage, term duration uncertainty, exclusion possession, brand/design control, community amenities, fit-out and management hassle ...  

All contributions welcome!